Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:54

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Rossendale man 'did not know what was wrong until I got NHS text' - BBC
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Health officials warn of measles case from traveler at Dulles Airport - The Washington Post
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The administration’s anti-consensus Mars plan will fail - SpaceNews
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
World Aquatics Takes Tough Stance on Enhanced Games - Newser
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What was your embarrassing moment in front of your father-in-law as an Indian daughter-in-law?
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
FX’s ‘Alien: Earth’ Official Trailer Reveals a Predatory Twist - The Hollywood Reporter
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.